S.K. Ross & Assoc., P.C.
Home What's Hot Newsletter Links About Us


Send us Feedback

Free Newsletter


TRANSPORTATION ISSUES

MINIMIZE CARGO DAMAGE
09/00

Wondering what you can do to minimize damage to your goods during shipment? Two excellent video tapes have been put out. One is geared towards ship operators and is entitled "Container Matters." The one directed to shippers and preventive measures available for use in the stowage of their containers is called "If you think any fool can stuff a container, think again!" Both can be ordered from www.ukpandi.com <http://www.ukpandi.com/> at US$50 each.

DO SWITCHED GOODS LEAD TO CARRIER LIABILITY?
09/00

In a case more common than most would wish to acknowledge, goods were substituted at time of stowage. The shipment was delivered seals in tact. Upon being opened, it was discovered that the 14 containers were stuffed with cement blocks instead of video tape holders. The seller had long since been paid through a letter of credit and disappeared, so the buyer sued the ocean consolidators and lost before the lower court. The trial judge found the bills of lading were not evidence of the contents of the containers. There is a line of cases arising in the shortage context which holds that where there is a weight variance, the fact that the goods being delivered weighed less might put the carrier on notice of a shortage. Such circumstances did not exist here. The shipment arrived seals in tact. The court found there was no way for the carrier to know about the substitution of goods from an external examination of the containers. While there was a slight weight variance, the court found it was not enough to put the consolidators on notice that goods were substituted. The shipper failed to put on proof regarding what the weight should have been. There was also the question of whether prompt notice of the claim was given as several containers remained unopened until weeks after delivery. Hence, the consolidators had no liability.

UP CLAIMS SUBJECT TO STB
12/97

One grain company recently sought a court order that Union Pacific Railroad be required to deliver 500 rail cars as promised. The court dismissed the case finding the matter had to be brought before the Surface Transportation Board. Will other claims against UP over their recent service problems reach the same result?

 

 

 

Copyright © 1999-2002 S.K. Ross & Assoc., P.C. The materials provided herewith are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. As the materials on this web site are generally time sensitive, for the most up-to-date information on a given topic you should be sure to contact us for more details.